There are some really funny moments in this film and some great acting (yeah, I know it’s a rom-com, but this one was an exception for me).Īnother movie I liked was The Commitments, about an Irish start-up band in Dublin whose manager envisions them as the “Saviors of Soul”. While not a great film, I’ve watched the rom-com Crossing Delancey more than once. I’m not going to try and rank it somewhere in a list of all-time great films I’ll just say that I’ve liked it enough to own the Blu-ray and I’ve watched it more than once. I think director Robert Zemeckis did a terrific job of telling an exciting story with emotionally involving characters and dramatic plot twists and turns. I’m with you on Contact I was wondering why no one on this science-oriented website had mentioned Carl Sagan’s novel. “double blind”? Does that mean you listened to the movies blindfolded? □ Too many of the other movies on these lists I must confess to not having seen, so that’s all I will say for now. I found The General dreadfully boring, for example, and couldn’t make it through very much of it. Maybe some of that is the difficulty of judging a movie outside of the time it was made. It’s a truly excellent movie, but I don’t really understand why it’s consistently near the top of the best-ever lists. I somewhat agree with Chris about Citizen Kane, though I would not be nearly so harsh. The Shining, the two concerns are never in tension: There is never a moment in The Shining where you are like, “Well that was cool, but somebody who is not into film is not really going to appreciate it,” whereas moments like that abound in 2001. ( Full Metal Jacket and The Shining would tie for first, Clockwork Orange would be third, and then I’d probably consider 2001) The problem with it is that what makes for great cinema sometimes trumps what makes for timelessly entertaining cinema, whereas in e.g. I am not really anywhere near enough of a film buff to make a list like this, but I do have to comment that 2001 is not the first, second, or even third Kubrick film I would choose. n.b.: after endless discussion of this movie with my film-buff nephew, who agrees with Ebert, I’m unlikely to change my mind. But I still think “The Tree of Life” is dreadful. The Godfather Parts 1 and 2 (Coppola, counted as one)Īnd of course I invite readers to submit their own list, or simply one or two choices of “best films,” or to praise or criticize any of the films listed above. Tokyo Story (plus Late Spring, Early Spring, and Late Autumn, all directed by Ozu and counted as one) Now I’ve previously published my own list of best movies in June of 2010, deliberately omitting “Citizen Kane”, which is such an obvious choice that I wanted to give other films a chance: I haven’t seen “2001: A Space Odyssey” (I believe I’m the only living America who can say this), but in general his choices are good ones, although I’m not with him on “Apocalypse Now” (I’d replace it with the Coppola films I give below) or, of course, “The Tree of Life,” This goes to show (take that, Nick Matzke) that there are no objectively great films. I cannot reconcile how bad I consider this film with how highly it’s been rated by many critics, including Ebert. As he says when justifying his choices (do read the piece), “Once any film has ever appeared on my S&S list, I consider it canonized.”īelow are Ebert’s selections this year he bumped “Dekalog” to keep the list at ten, and made the hideous mistake of replacing it with a film I consider dreadful: “The Tree of Life,” which I reviewed last November and found a pretentious, ponderous, and pointless waste of time. Well, movie critic Roger Ebert has spoken: in an essay on his Journal at The Chicago Sun-Times, he’s just compiled a list of his ten greatest films of all time, regardless of era, language, or anything else.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |